Context over counts.
Sources behind the answers.
The market splits in two: tools that score what an AI assistant said about you, and tools that count mentions. Neither explains the source conversations behind the AI answers. Few do it with EU hosting as a default.
Narrative intelligence is what separates Eidoscore from AI visibility trackers. A tracker counts whether you are mentioned. Eidoscore shows which story AI assistants tell about you, which public sources and communities that story comes from, how much it varies between runs, and what a named person should approve in response.
Five things that are different by design.
Built for public affairs, not purchase consideration.
Most AI visibility tools were built for marketing teams, and their metrics measure purchase consideration. Public affairs asks a different question: how a policy debate is framed, how your positions are represented, and what an adversarial actor would amplify.
We show the variance, because your board will find it anyway.
Ask a language model the same question twice and you get two answers. A single score averages away exactly the uncertainty a serious reader will probe. Eidoscore asks each question once per engine on every scheduled run, reports the range across runs and keeps every raw answer.
How we measureEU-native by architecture, not adaptation.
EU hosting, GDPR-aligned retention and a default of monitoring topics rather than individuals are design decisions, not a compliance page written afterwards. A Data Protection Impact Assessment precedes any scaled monitoring of political content.
Security and GDPRNarrative framing, not mention counts.
Knowing you were mentioned is weak. Knowing whether the mention was hostile, questioning, neutral or supportive, and whether it is likely false, an AI echo of a claim or an opportunity, is what supports a decision. Related mentions are grouped so you can see a story growing, fading or moving between platforms.
The sources the other tools do not read.
Public Telegram channels are where many European political narratives form first, and almost no visibility tool reads them. Eidoscore monitors public channels only, never private groups, and joins what is said there to what AI assistants later answer.
How the category splits.
A comparative view based on publicly available product information, reflecting Eidoscore as shipped today. Categories evolve quickly.
| Capability | Output-only AI tools | Traditional listening | Full-stack AI tools | Eidoscore |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI answer monitoring | Yes | Limited | Yes | Yes |
| Source conversation depth | No | Low | Medium | Yes |
| Context-level classification | Shallow | Mention counts | Varies | Yes |
| Narrative clustering across channels | No | No | Varies | Yes |
| Human-approved action loop | No | No | Partial | Yes |
| EU hosting by default | Varies | Varies | Varies | Yes |
If trust posture matters more than feature count, we would like to meet.
A working session on your own questions and channels, with real answers and sources. No obligation, and nothing sent without your approval.