Eidoscore traces how ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Mistral describe your organisation back to the Reddit and Telegram conversations that shape the answers, then turns the evidence into action your team approves.
AI assistants answer from a short list of sources. Public communities are where framings form first. Neither shows up in the analytics you already have.
Website and social dashboards show what happens on the channels you control. The conversations that shape your reputation happen elsewhere.
When someone asks an assistant about your organisation, it answers from the sources it trusts. If those are missing or stale, so is the answer.
A claim can cross from a Telegram channel to Reddit and into an AI answer within days. The correction usually arrives after the question.
AI answers, public conversations and the sources behind them are read together, so every figure comes with its evidence and a next step your team approves.
The two places your reputation is made, read side by side.
Thousands of mentions grouped into the stories that matter, with proof.
A daily briefing, drafted actions and a brief that leadership can trust.
Every figure is a range across scheduled runs, and every insight links to the posts and answers behind it.
Discover what matters, open the evidence behind it, and help your team decide what to do next, all in one place.
A rising narrative, in plain language, with the decision it needs today.
Opportunities and risks, measured the same way: with the evidence attached and a clear next step.
For every question that matters to you, Eidoscore shows which sources the engines relied on, where a competitor or an outdated article was used instead of your own pages, and what would close the gap.
Narratives are clustered from public conversations as they grow. You see where one started, how fast it is spreading, and whether any engine has picked it up yet, while there is still time to respond.
The same intelligence, framed for the work each team does. Pick a team to see what it watches and what it gets.
A daily briefing with what changed, and responses drafted for your approval.
For communicationsEvery figure on the platform links to the answers and posts behind it, and every limitation is stated rather than smoothed over.
Each question is asked once per engine on every scheduled run. You see the median and the range across runs, so a figure can survive scrutiny.
Every insight shows the original posts and AI answers, as written, with the sources each engine cited.
Flags are early warnings, not verdicts. A named person approves any action, and every decision is logged.
Public channels only, never private groups. Topics and narratives rather than individuals, on EU infrastructure.
Monitoring only matters if it reaches a decision. Each brief opens with what happened and what to do, then the figures behind it.
What happened this period, in plain language, and what needs a decision.
What to watch and what to fix, each with its recommended action.
Insights collected, active risks, new narratives and AI perception as a median with its range.
A working session on your own questions and channels, with real answers and sources. No obligation, and nothing sent without your approval.
