Position over time
How AI assistants describe your organisation and its positions against a defined comparison set, shown as a median with its range across scheduled runs. A trend you can rely on, not a score that shifts every time someone asks.
Solutions
Built for teams whose reputation is made in public.
Eidoscore turns one body of evidence into two kinds of intelligence. Strategic intelligence shows leaders where the organisation stands and what needs a decision. Communications intelligence shows comms teams what is being said, where it started and how to respond.
Your organisation Last 30 daysHow AI describes you
- Clarity82 78–87
- Tone71 64–77
- Narrative accuracy63 55–70
- Credibility58 50–66
Median and range across scheduled runs
Narrative momentum
- Hostile
- Questioning
- Supportive
Shaded band: range across runs
Where AI cites from
- 1News media34%
- 2Owned24%
- 3Government16%
- 4Comparison set15%
- 5Community9%
Emerging narratives
- Cost-of-living measuresRisingHigh
- Leadership credibilityEmergingMedium
- Policy U-turnPeakingCritical
- Industry regulationSteadyLow
For decision-makers
Strategic intelligence: decisions and oversight
Leaders, directors, boards and trustees do not need every post. They need a reliable weekly answer to three questions: what changed, does it matter, and does it need a decision from us?
A short decision queue
Only the items that need a leadership decision this week, kept apart from everything that does not. Risk and opportunity are scored the same way every week, so the meeting debates the decision, not the numbers.
Decisions on record
Every approval and rejection is logged with a name and a timestamp, in an audit log that cannot be edited. When a board or regulator asks why a response went out, the answer is already documented.
The brief
Every Monday at 06:00, plus a monthly brief. Ten minutes to read, fixed once generated and exported as PDF or DOCX, so the version the board read is the version on record.
See what the brief containsFor communications teams
Communications intelligence: monitor, investigate, respond
Press officers, campaign teams and public affairs advisers need to spot a story early, find out where it started and respond with evidence, not instinct.
Monitor
Posts from public Telegram channels and Reddit communities, grouped into narratives. Each narrative has a severity from Info to Critical and a momentum from emerging to fading, so you know what to look at first.
Investigate
Open any narrative to see the posts behind it, in the original language with a translation, and how it spread. See which web pages AI assistants cite about you, and where you are missing, outdated or weakly cited.
Respond
Each recommended action, from correcting a source to publishing an explainer, arrives as a draft with its reasoning. A named person on your side edits and approves it, and your team publishes it through your own channels.
The Command Centre
A daily briefing of what changed overnight, and an Action centre where every draft waits for a named approver.
See the Command CentreTwo perspectives, one evidence base
One evidence base, two ways to use it
Both draw on the same AI answers, posts and sources. The difference is the job: one supports the decision, the other supports the response.
| Dimension | Strategic intelligence | Communications intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Who it is for | Leaders, directors, boards and trustees | Press, campaign and public affairs teams |
| The job | Decisions and oversight | Monitoring, investigation and response |
| The question | Is our position getting stronger or weaker, and does anything need a decision? | What is being said, where did it start, and how do we respond? |
| How often | Weekly and monthly brief | Daily briefing in the Command Centre; daily alerts during a Campaign War Room period |
| Where it lives | The brief, as PDF or DOCX | The Command Centre: narratives, sources and the Action centre |
| What it produces | A decision on record | An approved response |
Choose your team
The same evidence, set up for your team
Each team gets its own topics, sources, comparison set and questions, agreed during onboarding.
Every solution includes
- Every figure shown as a range across scheduled runs per engine
- Every narrative linked to the posts and answers behind it
- A named person approves every action before it goes out
- A weekly brief, reviewed by an analyst and fixed once generated
Questions about strategic and communications intelligence
Common questions
Strategic intelligence supports decisions and oversight: where the organisation stands, how that is changing and what needs a decision. Communications intelligence supports monitoring, investigation and response: which narratives are moving, where they started and what to do about them. Both draw on the same evidence.
Leaders, directors and trustees usually read the brief and rarely need to open the platform. Press, campaign and public affairs teams work in the Command Centre every day. In a small team, one person often does both.
With the Intelligence Brief, from EUR 750 a month. For an election or a campaign, the Campaign War Room adds daily alerts and a direct channel to your analyst. See the pricing page for the details.
Prices and plans: see pricing. More answers on the FAQ page.
Next step
See AI visibility intelligence on your own narratives.
A working session on your questions and channels, with real answers and sources. Nothing is sent without your approval.